Malti Devi Vs State of Bihar

was married to Daroga Mahto in the year 2023, out of the wedlock a child was born. Further, on 26.07.2025 her daughter along with the child after dinner went to sleep in their room. It is next alleged that under a conspiracy, her husband along with the accused persons including the petitioners assaulted her daughter and killed her by putting a pillow on her face. Accordingly, on

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81080 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 2/3

¶21

receiving information, the informant reached the place of occurrence and informed the police and the dead body was sent for postmortem.

¶22

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that petitioners are sister-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased respectively. Petitioners are separate in mess and property. They were not involved in the day to day life of the deceased and her husband. There is no allegation of torture or dowry. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations, as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence and the entire allegation hinges around suspicion. It is also submitted that doctors opined the cause of death as asphyxia due to hanging. Similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 80478 of 2025. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

¶23

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81080 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 3/3

¶25

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1^st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Purushottampur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

¶26

However, it is made clear that if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned Trial Court bringing to its notice that petitioners despite giving assurance to this Court are not cooperating in the investigation, in that event, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

¶27

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶28

utkarsh/-

Malti Devi v. State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Malti Devi v. State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raviranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Aarti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Kashi Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Dipak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Daloo Sai @ Afshar Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Kumar @ Sudhanshu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar