Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in an FIR alleging assault on electricity department officials and tearing of theft-related documents. Considering the nature of accusation, the court rejected their prayer for anticipatory bail.
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8004 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2025 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
A.P.P for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8004 of 2026(2) dt.20-02-2026 2/2
for anticipatory bail of petitioners is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners apprehending arrest in Govindganj PS Case No. 191 of 2025 under B.N.S. provisions should be granted anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lucky Chaubey @ Abhishek Kumar Chaubey
Babita Devi
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
