Jeewan Prasad Singh @ Jivan Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79088 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2025 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad

======================================================

Jeewan Prasad Singh @ Jivan Prasad Singh S/o Late Rajeshwari Singh Resident of Near Surya Mandir, Chairman Road, Hamidganj, Ward No. 5, P.S.- Medininagar Town, District- Palumu (Jharkhand)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

		Versus
The State of Bihar
===============	====	... ... Opposite Party/s ===================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s	:	Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate Mr. Shivam, Advocate
For the Informant	:	Mr. Ansul, Sr. Advocate
For the State ===============	: ====	Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ===================================
CORAM: HONOU	RABL	E MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 22-01-2026

¶9

Heard Mr. Ajay Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ansul, learned Sr. counsel for the Informant and learned Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP for the State.

¶10

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 28.07.2025, in connection with Navinagar P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 25.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶11

The F.I.R. of the occurrence of firing to the brother of the informant is against unknown.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79088 of 2025(3) dt.22-01-2026 2/3

¶14

petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused person, namely, Gunja Singh and thereafter the petitioner has confessed his guilt in the present case and except the aforesaid, no other cogent material has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 28.07.2025.

¶15

Learned senior counsel for the Informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that it has come during investigation that the petitioner has fired upon the victim at the instance of co-accused Gunja Singh and apart from that the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of confessional statement and thereafter the petitioner has confessed his guilt in the present occurrence, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79088 of 2025(3) dt.22-01-2026 3/3

¶18

amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Aurangabad in connection with Navinagar P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

¶19

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶20

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶21

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶22

Ibrar//-

¶23

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶24

U T

Jeewan Prasad Singh @ Jivan Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeewan Prasad Singh @ Jivan Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uday Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Gora Sajan Basfor @ Sajan Basfor @ Gore Basfor Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar Pandey @ Sumit Pandey Vs The State of Bihar