Kara Ray @ Dinesh Ray @ Kiran Ray @ Dinelsh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7479 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2017 Thana- FATUA District- Patna

======================================================

Kara Ray @ Dinesh Ray @ Kiran Ray @ Dinelsh Ray S/o Babaji Ray @ Suraj Ray R/o Village - Gadhochak, P.S - Fatuha, District - Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kahkashan Alam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 19-02-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases out of which one case is under the excise act and allegation is of recovery of 10 liters of liquor from a sack.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Nageshwar in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7479 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026 2/2

¶19

anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 302 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

¶21

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than two cases then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of two cases only, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶22

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kara Ray @ Dinesh Ray @ Kiran Ray @ Dinelsh Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kara Ray @ Dinesh Ray @ Kiran Ray @ Dinelsh Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vimlesh Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Raza Kumar Singh @ Raza Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Prayag Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar @ Kausa Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Kumar @ Prakash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rita Devi Vs The State of Bihar