Allowed¶¶19

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak v. The State of Bihar

Bail – Regular bail

Patna HC6 Feb 2026CR. MISC./7468/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak v. The State of Bihar; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7468 of 2026; Patna High Court; decision dated 06-02-2026; Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey; regular bail; BNS sections 318(4), 337, 338, 336(3), 340(2); forged domicile certificate; Adhar card; counseling; Begusarai Mufassil P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025; parity with co-accused granted bail in Cr. Misc. Nos. 39145 and 38534 of 2025; judicial custody since 02.12.2025; no criminal antecedent; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; CJM Begusarai.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on regular bail in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai. ¶¶19

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7468 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Son of Paras Nath Ram Resident of village -Surharpur, Haricharan, Gazipur, PS -Sadiyabad Distt -Gazipur State- Uttar Prasesh Presently At present Bairiya, Ward No. 06, P.S -Kataiya Distt -Gopalganj Bihar

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sarvottam Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 06-02-2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 318 (4), 337, 338, 336 (3) and 340 (2) of the BNS.

¶14

3. The case of the prosecution is that during counseling, it was found that some persons have prepared forged certificates, namely, domicile certificate and Adhar cards and petitioner is one of them.

¶15

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7468 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/2

¶17

three persons were apprehended and one person managed to escape. It is further submitted that the three apprehended persons have been granted bail, out of which, two were granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39145 of 2025 and its analogous case and one has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38534 of 2025. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 02.12.2025 having no criminal antecedent.

¶18

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶19

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

¶20

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

Jagdish/-

¶22

U T

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Biresh Yadav @ Brish Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Tarun Kumar Vs The Directorate of Enforcement, Patna Zonal Office, Patna.

Akshay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ashutosh Kumar @ Ashutosh Kunwar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandrakant Yadav Vs The State of Bihar