Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra pd Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73480 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2022 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra Pd. Yadav S/O Rama Shish Rai R/O VillageMathiya Bariyar Pur, P.S- Pipra, Dist- East champran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 21-01-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 132 of 2022 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354B, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per prosecution case, the petitioner and other co-accused persons armed with lathi , danda , iron rod , Farsa , knife came to the doors of the informant and assaulted the informant. When the elder brother of the informant intervened, he was assaulted by this petitioner on his head causing fracture. Other family members of the informant were also assaulted.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no injury report of Narad Rai on record, though injury

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73480 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 2/3

¶15

report of one Naresh Rai is on record and the said person is stated to be brother of the informant, but his injury is superficial as injury suffered by the person is stated to be incised wound on right parietal region of size 3"x1/3"x skin deep apart from bruise on left forehead of size 3"x1/2", though injury no. 1 is stated to be caused by sharp cutting substance and the weapon attributed to the petitioner is Farsa which is a heavy sharp cutting weapon and such superficial injury would not be caused by Farsa . Learned counsel further submits that there is case and counter and one Arvind Rai from the petitioner's side has filed case against the informant and others as they called his mother witch and assaulted the persons of the petitioner's side. The petitioner is having clean antecedent and he is in custody since 22.07.2025. The charge sheet has been submitted.

¶16

Learned APP opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

¶17

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the case and counter case between the parties and further considering the superficial nature of injury of the victim of assault by the petitioner and also considering the period of custody of the petitioner, his clean and submission of charge

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73480 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 3/3

¶19

sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari/concerned Court in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 132 of 2022, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following conditions :

¶20

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶21

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶22

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶23

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶24

DKS/-

¶25

U T

Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra pd Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra pd Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukul Kumar @ Priya Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar Singh @ Raju Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govenment of Bihar, Patna.

Sheikh Munna @ Shekh Munna Vs The State of Bihar

Sujeet Kumar @ Golu Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Govindra Kumar @ Govinda Kumar Vs The State of Bihar