Allowed¶19

Binit Kumar @ Harsh Raj Anand v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Feb 2026CR. MISC./69238/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted; S.395 IPC; Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 285 of 2019 (District Patna); informant dragged from truck, beaten, robbed of purse containing Rs.3500/- and ATM card; petitioner in custody since 25.07.2025; only confessional statement of co-accused Vicky Kumar cited by defence; APP J.N. Thakur opposed; bail bond Rs.10,000 with two like sureties before ACJM-III, Barh; condition to cooperate in trial; Crl. Misc. No.69238 of 2025; decided 05-02-2026; Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J; Patna High Court.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-III, Barh, in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 285 of 2019, subject to condition of cooperation in the trial. ¶19

Binit Kumar @ Harsh Raj Anand Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69238 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2019 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Binit Kumar @ Harsh Raj Anand S/o Chandrasekhar Prasad Singh @ Chandrasekhar Prasad @ Chandrasekhar Prasad Rai R/o Village / Mohalla - New Bypass Raghopur Bhakhityarpur, P.S - Bhakhityarpur, District - Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kumari Sujata Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 05-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

This is an application for regular bail on behalf

¶13

of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Section 395 of the IPC, registered in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S.Case No. 285 of 2019.

¶14

As per allegation, while the informant was sleeping in his truck, all on a sudden, the accused persons dragged him out of the vehicle and rained blows and punches on him. They robbed the informant of his purse containing Rs.3500/- and an ATM card.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. He is in custody since 25.07.2025. Nothing has been

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69238 of 2025(4) dt.05-02-2026 2/2

¶17

recovered from his possession. Except the confessional statement of co-accused Vicky Kumar, there is nothing against the petitioner.

¶18

On the other hand, Mr. J.N. Thakur, the learned APP for the State, has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶19

Considering the above facts and circumstances as well as the period of custody, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-III, Barh in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S.Case No. 285 of 2019, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

¶20

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

HR/-

¶22

U T

Binit Kumar @ Harsh Raj Anand v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binit Kumar @ Harsh Raj Anand v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

nikhil Kumar @ Tabahi Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bhusan Mandal @ Shashi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajan Pandit @ Rajan Kumar Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Ujjawal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar