Dismissed¶18

Lalu Yadav @ Gautam Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Feb 2026CR. MISC./68371/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.68371 of 2025, Justice Rajiv Roy, decided 11-02-2026. Anticipatory bail application of Lalu Yadav @ Gautam Kumar rejected in Muffasil (Nawada) P.S. Case No. 508/2024 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 74, 109, 3(5) B.N.S.; grounds: criminal antecedent and grievous scalp injury; direction to surrender within four weeks with same-day disposal of bail plea.

What did the court decide?

No bail relief; petitioner permitted to surrender within four weeks, with the court concerned to take up and dispose of the bail plea preferably on the same day. ¶18

Lalu Yadav @ Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68371 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-508 Year-2024 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Lalu Yadav @ Gautam Kumar Son of Sunil Yadav Resident Of Village - Kena Tola Pokhar Par, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Nawada.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 11-02-2026 Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad,learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 508/2024 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 74, 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S. lodged on 25.12.2024 by the informant, Sitasharan Yadav.

¶14

As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that the accused persons armed variously came and on the issue of land dispute, assaulted the family members of the informant. The specific allegation is against this petitioner that he gave rifle blow on the son of the informant.

¶15

Though, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon this Court regarding his innocence, learned APP has taken this Court to learned Sessions Judge order to show

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68371 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2

¶17

that the injury on the scalp has been found to be grievous in nature. Further submission is that he has criminal antecedent.

¶18

Considering the submissions of the parties as also the criminal antecedent coupled with the fact that the injury has been found to be grievous, in that background, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

¶19

If the petitioner surrenders within four weeks and seek bail, the court concerned shall take up the matter and dispose it of preferably on the same day.

¶20

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶21

Ravi/-

¶22

U T

Lalu Yadav @ Gautam Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalu Yadav @ Gautam Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Islam and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ganesh Kumar Alias Ganesh Kumar Sinha Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Raman Nagule and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Umesh Thakur @ Uamesh Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Shyama Kumari Vs The State of Bihar