Allowed¶20

Mithilesh Ravidas @ Mithilesh Mochi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jan 2026CR. MISC./680/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.680 of 2026, decided 15-01-2026 by Partha Sarthy, J. Mithilesh Ravidas @ Mithilesh Mochi v. The State of Bihar. Regular bail application in Kadirganj P.S. Case No.189 of 2025 (District Patna) under section 20(a)(i) N.D.P.S. Act; allegation of 50 cannabis plants near petitioner's house; custody since 11.10.2025; chargesheet filed; no criminal antecedents; bail granted on bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner to be enlarged on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge (N.D.P.S), Patna. ¶20

Mithilesh Ravidas @ Mithilesh Mochi Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.680 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2025 Thana- KADIRGANJ District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mithilesh Ravidas @ Mithilesh Mochi Son of Late Baleshwar Ravidas Resident of Village- Harla, P.S.- Kadirganj, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kahkashan Alam, Advocate Mr.Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate Ms.Puja Kumari, Advocate Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 15-01-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this application for

¶14

grant of regular bail in connection with Kadirganj P.S Case no.189 of 2025 registered under section 20 (a)(i) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, on information having been received and a raid being conducted, it is stated that 50 Cannabis plants were found planted adjacent to the house of the petitioner and within the temporary boundary wall. As such the FIR.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.680 of 2026(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2

¶18

incriminating article as alleged in the FIR has been recovered. Even as per the allegations in the FIR, the alleged place of recovery cannot be said to be under the exclusive control of the petitioner. He is in custody since 11.10.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶19

The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR, the petitioner having remained in custody for 3 months since 11.10.2025, chargesheet having been submitted in the case and especially the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Kadirganj P.S Case no.189 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge (N.D.P.S), Patna.

¶21

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶22

Shiv/-

¶23

U T

Mithilesh Ravidas @ Mithilesh Mochi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithilesh Ravidas @ Mithilesh Mochi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Pragash Rai Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kanchan Kumari and Ors. Vs The Chairman Of The Selection Committee and Ors.

Bhankul Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ashik Kumar @ Ashik @ Chhotu @ Chhote Sarkar Vs The State of Bihar