Suryadev Singh @ Suraj Singh Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-02-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a connection with Garkha P.S. Case No.723 of 2025 dated 26.09.2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶14

As per the FIR, due to a monetary dispute, the accused persons, including the petitioner, abused and assaulted the informant with a dab, causing a head injury. When the informant’s family members intervened, they were also assaulted.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6632 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3

¶17

present case. He further submits that the nature of the injury referred to in the impugned order does not corroborate the allegations levelled against the petitioner. With respect to the other family members who are stated to have sustained injuries, the allegation of specific overt acts is against the other accused persons named in the FIR. It is further submitted that there is a case and counter-case between the parties. The petitioner had lodged Garkha P.S. Case No. 722 of 2025 dated 26.09.2025, and thereafter the informant lodged the present case against the petitioner as a counterblast. The incident is stated to have occurred owing to a free fight between the parties. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

¶18

On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Taking into account that the injuries are simple in nature and there is case and counter case between the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra/Successor Court in connection with

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6632 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3

¶21

Garkha P.S. Case No.723 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS as well as the following conditions:

¶22

(i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

¶23

(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

¶24

(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

¶25

(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.

¶26

(Ajit Kumar, J)

¶27

shikha/-

¶28

U T

Suryadev Singh @ Suraj Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suryadev Singh @ Suraj Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanju Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhanshu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kaushal Kishore Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Akash Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Abhinash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Talim Vs The State of Bihar