Quashing petition against a revisional order in a Purnea complaint case; the underlying complaint was already disposed of in 2019, so the High Court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62180 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-798 Year-2017 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPurnia
======================================================
Devanand Singh S/o Late Satyanand Singh, R/o Mohalla- Srinagar Hata, P.S.Khajanchi Haat, District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Nand Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62180 of 2018(4) dt.15-06-2026 2/2
it has become infructuous.
it has become infructuous.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
utkarsh/-koustav
U T
Devanand Singh
The State of Bihar
Munna Kumar
Ashwini Kumar Singh
Ganesh Prasad Verma
Babban Singh
Sunil Dutta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
