Shaurabh Thakur @ Shaurabh Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Roshan Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

6 03-02-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The accused-petitioner, named in the F.I.R., is

¶15

apprehending his arrest in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 58 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per FIR, the wife of informant found missing while she went to deliver the milk to co-villager since 16.02.2024.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶18

petitioner submitted that save and except suspicion, nothing appears against the petitioner. In support of his submission,

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61880 of 2024(6) dt.03-02-2026 2/3

¶20

learned counsel drawn attention of this Court towards paragraph 23 of the case diary and submitted that thrust of allegation is available against Karelal Thakur, who has already

¶21

been granted regular bail by this Court, and this petitioner being son of said co-accused Karelal Thakur, implicated with the present occurrence. It is further submitted that if paragraph 23 of the case diary i.e. re-statement of informant, be taken into consideration, then certainly the co-accused persons must be named in the FIR, but missing of their names in the FIR only suggests that petitioner and other co-accused persons were named as a matter of an afterthought. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

¶22

Learned A.P.P. for the State is present.

¶23

In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

¶24

taking note of the fact as admittedly informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence, where merely on the basis of suspicion, as the petitioner is son of main accused Karelal Thakur as mentioned aforesaid, prima facie he was implicated with the present case, accordingly, above-named petitioner,

¶25

in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61880 of 2024(6) dt.03-02-2026 3/3

¶27

weeks from this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate – 1^st , Naugachhia, District - Bhagalpur/concerned court in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 58 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short “B.N.S.S.”).

¶28

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶29

Rajeev/-

¶30

U T

Shaurabh Thakur @ Shaurabh Kumar Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaurabh Thakur @ Shaurabh Kumar Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shakil Khan @ Sakila Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Dadan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ashif @ Md. Ashif Vs The State Of Bihar

Tej Narayan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Sundar Chaudhary @ Shyam Sundar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Aditya Kishore Aditya Vs The State of Bihar