Allowed¶20

Raj Kumar Bind v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jan 2026CR. MISC./611/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.611 of 2026, Raj Kumar Bind v. The State of Bihar, oral order dated 19-01-2026 by Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra; bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in Bypass P.S. Case No. 593 of 2025; 43 litres of liquor recovered from plastic sac; defence plea of recovery from open public place and non-compliance of Section 103 BNSS 2023; custody since 02.12.2025; no criminal antecedent; bail granted on bonds of Rs. 15,000 with two like sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court. ¶20

Raj Kumar Bind Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.611 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-593 Year-2025 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raj Kumar Bind S/o Parmanand Beldar Resident of Village- Bahri Begampur, Sidhe Bazar Chauraha, P.S.- Bypass, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 19-01-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 593 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 43 litres of liquor has been recovered from plastic sac.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from an open place which is accessible to public at large. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.611 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/2

¶18

liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 02.12.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶19

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 593 of 2025.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Alok Verma/-

¶24

U T

Raj Kumar Bind v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar Bind v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmi Prasad @ Vicky Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Yadav @ Anil Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Barjun Ram @ Warjun Ram @ Varjun Ram Vs The State of Bihar