Akshay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5817 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1104 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Akshay Kumar Son of Lal Babu Rai @ Lal Babu Yadav Resident of VillagePashi, Faridpur, P.S.- Janipur, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajanan Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 28-01-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Phulwari (Janipur) P.S. Case No. 1104 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

¶14

As per the F.I.R., one pistol has been recovered from the co-accused Gautam Kumar who confessed that the said pistol belongs to the petitioner.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from the co-accused Gautam Kumar. Learned counsel further

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5817 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2

¶17

submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered arms and ammunitions. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2025 and has one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Phulwari (Janipur) P.S. Case No. 1104 of 2025.

¶21

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶22

Alok Verma/-

¶23

U T

Akshay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akshay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Surith Giri Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Ray @ Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chitranjan Rai @ Chitranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar