Petitioners in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5817 of 2019 sought permission to withdraw their petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition allowed and petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5817 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1890 Year-2017 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
After short argument, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the
present petition.
stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Sudha/- U T
Naim Mian S/o Late Ish Mohammad
Amin Mian@ Amin Ansari S/o Late Ish Mohammad
Kalim Mian S/o Late Ish Mohammad
Sahjad Alam S/o Naim Mian
The State of Bihar
Azad Alam S/o Naim Mian
Chandra Shekhar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
