Petitioner in a criminal miscellaneous application arising from a Rohtas PS case did not appear; counsel for opposite party No. 2 informed the court that the petitioner had been acquitted, rendering the matter infructuous. The application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5773 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2021 Thana- KOCHAS District- Rohtas
======================================================
NISHU RAI WIFE OF CHUNNU RAI @ SARVOTTAM RAI Resident of Village- Salathua, P.S.- Kudra, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr.Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER
4 10-02-2026
A.P.P. for the State are present.
(Sourendra Pandey, J)
Gautam/- U T
Nishu Rai
The State of Bihar
Manjiv Mishra
Sourendra Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
