Sikandar Chauhan v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Patna High Court; Cr. Misc. No.56947 of 2018; decided 12-02-2026; Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra. Petitioner Sikandar Chauhan v. State of Bihar and Rajpati Devi (opposite parties). Quashing petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against order dated 12.04.2018 of Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in A.B.P. No. 549 of 2018, objecting to condition under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. attached to anticipatory bail in Complaint Case No. 3211 of 2013 (Tr. No. 1310 of 2018), PS Case No. 3211/2013, P.S. Gopalganj, offence under Section 498A IPC. Disposed of on counsel's joint submission; no merits decided; useful only as an instance of disposal by consent, not for any proposition on anticipatory-bail conditions.
What did the court decide?
Upon learned counsel for the petitioner submitting that the case may be disposed of, and with the learned A.P.P. for the State having no objection, the Court disposed of the petition without adjudicating the challenged condition imposed under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.