Dismissed¶17

Rakesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2026CR. MISC./56072/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Cr. Misc. No.56072 of 2025 (Ajit Kumar, J., 21-01-2026): anticipatory bail application under B.N.S. Sections 140(1) (kidnapping) and 3(5) arising from Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 140 of 2025 rejected; petitioners (Rakesh Kumar Yadav and Hari Shankar Yadav) directed to surrender before the district court within four weeks; future petition to be decided on merits without prejudice. Keywords: anticipatory bail refusal, BNS 140(1)(2?), kidnapping, surrender direction, Madhubani.

What did the court decide?

None; anticipatory bail declined and the petitioners were directed to surrender before the district court within four weeks from the date of the order to seek appropriate remedy. ¶17

Rakesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56072 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2025 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rakesh Kumar Yadav son of Chandradeo Yadav Resident of villageChiknauta PS -Ladaniya District- Madhubani

¶5

Hari Shankar Yadav Son of Vijay Yadav Resident of village- Chiknauta PS -Ladaniya District- Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Anish Chandra, APP For the Informant : Mr. Ashad, Adv. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 21-01-2026

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State as also counsel representing the Informant.

¶15

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 140 of 2025 (G.R. No. 1006 of 2025) dated 05.05.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 140(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

¶16

As per prosecution case, the accusation against the petitioners is of kidnapping the grandson of the Informant.

¶17

Looking to the nature of allegation, reference of which finds mentioned in the order impugned dated 14.07.2025, referring to the materials surfaced during course of investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56072 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026 2/2

¶19

anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶20

However, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the district court for seeking appropriate remedy within a period of four weeks from today.

¶21

It is expected that on submission of appropriate petition, his case should be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by the order passed by this Court.

¶22

(Ajit Kumar, J)

¶23

rishi/-

¶24

U T

Rakesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Prakash Pathak Vs The State of Bihar

Savita Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Surendra Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Rishu Kumar @ Duldul @ Duldul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Singh @ Rahul kr. Singh @ Rahul Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar