Dismissed¶20

Gonu Sah @ Doma Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 May 2026CR. MISC./5430/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.5430 of 2026, decided 07-05-2026 by Prabhat Kumar Singh, J. Anticipatory bail refused to Gonu Sah @ Doma Kumar Sah in Araria R.S. P.S. Case No. 173 of 2025 (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 124(1), 109(1), 351(2), 351(3), 352). Allegations of assault and throwing of acid on the informant's side with nine persons sustaining burn injuries; plea of general and omnibus allegation without specific overt act did not prevail; refusal rested on the nature of accusation and injuries.

What did the court decide?

Considering the nature of accusation and injuries, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused. ¶20

Gonu Sah @ Doma Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5430 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2025 Thana- R S P.S. District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Gonu Sah @ Doma Kumar Sah S/o Chandranand Sah @ Chandrannd Sah R/o vill - Matiyari, ward no. 1, Dhama, P.S.- Araria R.S., Distt.- Araria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Md Naushaduzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Kumar Ravi Shankar, Advocate ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 07-05-2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant

¶12

and the State.

¶13

Petitioner apprehends arrest in Araria R.S. P. S.

¶14

Case No. 173 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 124(1), 109(1), 351(2), 351(3), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶15

It is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, assaulted informant and others and threw acid upon them.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Allegation against petitioner is general and omnibus and there is no allegation of any specific overt act against petitioner. Petitioner

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5430 of 2026(4) dt.07-05-2026 2/2

¶18

claims clean antecedent.

¶19

Learned counsel for the informant opposed the bail application and submitted that there is specific accusation that this petitioner along with other accused threw acid upon informant’s side due to which nine persons sustained burn injuries.

¶20

Considering the nature of accusation and injuries, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.

¶21

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶22

Navya/-

¶23

U T

Gonu Sah @ Doma Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gonu Sah @ Doma Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Yadav @ Lakshmi Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Binni Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ratan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Uttim Chaupal Vs The State of Bihar

Mina Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Jaysawal @ Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar