Disposed¶19

Ram Kumar Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav @ R. K. Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Jan 2026CR. MISC./53071/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Cr. Misc./Criminal Miscellaneous No.53071 of 2025, decided 09-01-2026 by Dr. Anshuman, J. (oral order). Regular-bail application in S.T. No. 245 of 2021 / Nirmali P.S. Case No. 86 of 2021 (Sections 364, 364A, 34 IPC), Supaul, disposed of without merits due to non-compliance with order dated 26.09.2025 requiring supplementary affidavit on non-absconding across seventeen pending cases; documents unavailable from Pairwikar; liberty to file fresh bail application.

What did the court decide?

No order on merits; liberty reserved to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail through a fresh criminal application once the outstanding documents become available. ¶19

Ram Kumar Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav @ R. K. Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53071 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2021 Thana- NIRMALI District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Kumar Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav @ R. K. Yadav S/o- Sir Rameshwar Yadav Village- Phulkaha Katti W.No-5, Ps- Sukhipur Dist- Sirha Nepal

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 09-01-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.T. No. 245 of 2021, arising out of Nirmali P.S. Case No. 86 of 2021, lodged on 31.05.2021, under Sections 364, 364A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending before the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge IV, Supaul.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks a further four weeks’ time to comply with the order dated 26.09.2025. Counsel further submits that, till date, the documents have not been made available by the Pairwikar .

¶16

It transpires to this Court that the present bail application has been pending since August 2025 and compliance with the order has remained pending since September 2025,

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53071 of 2025(5) dt.09-01-2026 2/2

¶18

wherein the petitioner was directed to file a supplementary affidavit, along with supporting documents, demonstrating that he is not absconding in any of the cases pending against him, which are seventeen in number.

¶19

As such, this Court refrains from passing any order on merits and disposes off this application, observing that whenever the documents become available to the petitioner, he may renew his prayer for bail by filing a fresh criminal application.

¶20

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶21

Aman Kumar/-

¶22

Ram Kumar Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav @ R. K. Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Kumar Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav @ R. K. Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ghanshyam Kumar Singh, Vs The State of Bihar

Abdul Hamid Vs The State of Bihar

Shivjee Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Salim Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar @ Kishna Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Singh Vs The State Of Bihar