Komal Kumar @ Komal Kumar Ray @ Kumar @ Kunal Ray Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Udeshya Kumar Yadav, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 17-01-2026

¶12

Heard Mr. Udeshya Kumar Yadav, learned Counsel

¶13

for the petitioner and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 239 of 2023 for the offence registered under sections 420, 406, 120(B) of the IPC lodged on 01.05.2023.

¶15

As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that different schemes were allotted to the Gram Panchayat, Sugapatti but later, they came to know that the amount to the tune of Rs. 13,65,900/- have been misappropriated by the accused which included the petitioner herein. This led to the FIR.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that at

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52592 of 2025(4) dt.17-01-2026 2/4

¶18

time, measurement was not done which led to the said figure. Later, on 19.11.2024, the Block Development Officer, Phulparas in a letter addressed to the Deputy Development Commissionercum-Certificate Officer, Madhubani informed that out of Rs. 13,65,900/-, as per the measurement, worth Rs. 13,53,764/- has been done and after some more deduction, the amount that needs to be deposited is only Rs. 9736/- which has already come in the corpus of the State Government through the person concerned. Accordingly, the request was made for concluding the Certificate Case No. 61/2022-23 (Annexure-3 to the petition).

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the said Annexure would show that payment has been made but if still the State Government comes to the conclusion that some money has been left out, he is ready to return the same. The last submission is that the petitioner do not have criminal antecedent.

¶20

Learned APP, Mr. Bharat Bhushan, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail submitting that as per the FIR, the misappropriation took place. However, he concede that the BDO, Phulparas has later issued the aforesaid letter.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52592 of 2025(4) dt.17-01-2026 3/4

¶22

Considering the submissions of the parties and the undertaking given by the petitioner that if still some money is left, the same shall be paid, the BDO, Phulparas has made request for conclusion of the Certificate proceeding, as recorded above, this petitioner do not have criminal antecedent, in that background, this Court is inclined to grant him the anticipatory bail with conditions.

¶23

Let the petitioner in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 239 of 2023 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

(i) one of the bailor should be the family members/relatives of the petitioner, who shall provide official document (Aadhar Card, PAN Card, Driving License, Voter ID) to show his bona fide ;

¶25

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52592 of 2025(4) dt.17-01-2026 4/4

¶27

bond by the Trial court itself;

¶28

(iii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

¶29

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.

¶30

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶31

Vijay Singh/-

¶32

U T

Komal Kumar @ Komal Kumar Ray @ Kumar @ Kunal Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Komal Kumar @ Komal Kumar Ray @ Kumar @ Kunal Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lappu Das Vs The State of Bihar through the Addl. Chief Secretary-cum-Principal Secretary

Anshu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Baban Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Harendra Rai @ Dharmendra Kumar @ Harendra Ray @ Dharmendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Sujeet Kumar Mishra @ Sujeet Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Farjana Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar