Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Ray Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51311 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2026 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali

======================================================

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Ray S/o Suresh Rai Resident of VillageGopalpur Chaknai @ Govindpur Gokhula, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sucheta Yadav ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 24-07-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 8636.76 liters of liquor from a truck and two pick up vehicles.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of any of the seized vehicles and came to be implicated at

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51311 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/3

¶17

the instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is also submitted that if Chowkidar was aware of the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence then why he did not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 252 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

¶20

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51311 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 3/3

¶22

antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

Rishabh/-

¶25

U T

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birendra Yadav @ Birendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Babloo ram Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Manohar Ray @ Manohar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar