Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in an assault case alleging a case and counter-case between villagers over a petty dispute. The State opposed citing head injuries. The court declined anticipatory bail but directed the trial court to consider regular bail on surrender within four weeks on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5027 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-491 Year-2025 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukul Kumari, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5027 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3
allegation that they have assaulted the informant by lathi and iron rod (kanti) and also to his younger brother due to which he became injured.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5027 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3
occipital region. In addition to that, three more injuries have been found.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Prakashmani/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners apprehending arrest in a cross-case arising from the same village dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharmendra Kumar
Suraj Kumar @ Nagendra Paswan @ Suraj
Sachin Kumar
Bhuneshwar Kumar @ Chhotu
The State of Bihar
Dr. Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
