Dismissed¶19

Pramod Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Feb 2026CR. MISC./4983/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: anticipatory bail; bail rejected; B.N.S. Sections 103(1), 109, 61(2), 3(5); F.I.R. named accused; assault with iron rod; death of informant's son; PS Case No. 226 of 2025; Thana Chakia; East Champaran; Patna High Court; CR. MISC. No.4983 of 2026; order dated 11-02-2026; Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh; petitioner Pramod Rai; State of Bihar; APP Asha Kumari; counsel Anuj Kumar; clean antecedents; gravity of offence.

What did the court decide?

The prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that the petitioner was one of the assailants of the deceased, and the gravity of the offence. ¶19

Pramod Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4983 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pramod Rai Son of Late Lalji Rai Resident of Village- Ganesh Sirisiya, P.S.Chakia, District- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Asha Kumari, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 11-02-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 109, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

¶14

As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, abused and assaulted son of informant by means of iron rod due to which he died.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence and petitioner has falsely been implicated in this

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4983 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/2

¶17

case merely on suspicion. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶18

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with other accused persons, assaulted son of informant due to which he died.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, fact that petitioner is one of the assailant of the deceased and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

shashank/-

¶22

U T

Pramod Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhairo Yadav @ Bhero Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Sahni @ Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Samim Ansri @ Samim Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Nawal Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Manjesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bhushan Singh Vs The State of Bihar