Karan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pushp Raj Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 22-07-2026

¶11

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶13

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 18.150 litres of liquor from a scooty.

¶14

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49789 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3

¶16

create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that Nipu would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also apprehended from the spot along with Karan.

¶17

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶18

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 198 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶19

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49789 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3

¶21

anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶22

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶23

Sumit/-

¶24

U T

Karan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sugandhi Chaudhary @ Mahavir Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sashi Bhushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Daulti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rudal Chaudhary @ Rudal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar