Allowed¶23

Chandrama Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2026CR. MISC./49089/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.49089 of 2026; Justice Shailendra Singh; order dated 22-07-2026; East Champaran; Motihari Muffasil PS Case No. 205 of 2026; BNS S.126(2), S.115(2), S.118(1), S.109, S.296, S.352, S.3(5); BNSS S.482(2); bail bond Rs. 20,000/-; two sureties; fair and clean antecedents; simple injuries; Chandrama Kumari; Lalan Kumar; Rahul Kumar; State of Bihar.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail to the three named petitioners upon arrest/surrender before the learned court below within six weeks, on bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. ¶23

Chandrama Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49089 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2026 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandrama Kumari, Daughter of Harendra Sahani, Resident Of villageMadhubani Ghat, P. S.- Muffasil, Dist- East Champaran At Motihari

¶5

Lalan Kumar, Son of Shankar Sahani, Resident Of village- Madhubani Ghat, P.S- Muffasil, Dist- East Champaran At Motihari

¶6

Rahul Kumar, Son of Tapeshwar Sahani, Resident Of village- Madhubani Ghat, P. S.- Muffasil, Dist- East Champaran At Motihari

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 22-07-2026 Heard the parties.

¶17

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in

¶18

connection with Motihari Muffasil P. S. Case No. 205 of 2026 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 296, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.

¶19

3. The main submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners are that all the petitioners bear no criminal antecedent and the allegation as to assaulting the prosecution party does not get corroboration from the injury

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49089 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3

¶21

reports which have been filed as Annexure- 2 series. It is further submitted that three persons are said to have sustained injuries and their injuries have been opined to be simple in nature among them one sustained only body pain. It is further submitted that the FIR itself goes to show that the alleged occurrence was not preplanned and that the same took place in the spur of the moment. It is further submitted that the allegations have been exaggerated by the informant to make the alleged occurrence appear more serious in nature.

¶22

4. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer of the petitioners.

¶23

5. Considering the above submissions as well as the facts and circumstances of this case coupled with petitioners' fair and clean antecedent and the nature of the injuries sustained by the injured persons, this court is inclined to the grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, let the petitioners named-above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Motihari Muffasil P. S. Case No. 205 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49089 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3

¶25

each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶26

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶27

Rajiv/-

¶28

U T

Chandrama Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrama Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunny Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Akshay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Nayak @ Karu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Ashish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar