Allowed¶24

Rukhsar Parveen v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 May 2026CR. MISC./48626/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.48626 of 2025 (Praveen Kumar, J., 15-05-2026): quashing of FIR, Bairya P.S. Case No. 501 of 2020 (West Champaran), Sections 323, 341, 504, 406, 420, 120B and 384 IPC; compromise/settlement between parties; matrimonial discord; submission that Section 384 IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 are non-compoundable; FIR quashed in the interest of justice.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of the FIR bearing Bairya P.S. Case No. 501 of 2020 dated 24.11.2020 ¶24

Rukhsar Parveen Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48626 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-501 Year-2020 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rukhsar Parveen W/o Amjad Khan Resident of H No C 67, Gali No 3, Right E Block, Top Floor, Hardev Nagar, Jharoda Mazra, Burari, PO- Burari, PSWazirabad, District- North Delhi

¶5

Muskan @ Muskan Khatoon D/o Munna Ahmad Resident of H No C 67, Gali No 3, Right E Block, Top Floor, Hardev Nagar, Jharoda Mazra, Burari, PO- Burari, PS- Wazirabad, District- North Delhi

¶6

Rubina Praween D/o Munna Ahmad Resident of H No C 67, Gali No 3, Right E Block, Top Floor, Hardev Nagar, Jharoda Mazra, Burari, POBurari, PS- Wazirabad, District- North Delhi

¶7

Imran Imam S/o Md. Nezam R/o Dargah Chauraha, P.S.- Sultanganj, Mahendru, Distt. - Patna

¶8

... ... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar

¶11

Amzad Khan S/o Late Abdul Sattar Khan R/o Miyanpur, Silangahi, P.S.Bairaiya, Distt.- West Champaran

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhumay Madhup, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶17

3 15-05-2026

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

¶19

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for Opposite Party No.2.

¶20

2. This application has been filed for quashing of the

¶21

FIR bearing Bairya P.S. Case No. 501 of 2020 dated 24.11.2020 registered for the offences against the petitioners under Sections 323, 341, 504, 406, 420, 120B and 384 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48626 of 2025(3) dt.15-05-2026 2/2

¶23

3. It has been submitted that petitioners and Opposite Party No. 2 have compromised their case outside the Court and good sense has prevailed between the parties. It has further been submitted that parties have entered into compromise without threat, coercion or promise. It has further been submitted that the offences under Section 384 IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 are not compoundable. The dispute arose out of matrimonial discord.

¶24

4. In the interest of justice, since the parties have entered into compromise, the FIR bearing Bairya P.S. Case No. 501 of 2020 dated 24.11.2020, is hereby quashed.

¶25

(Praveen Kumar, J)

¶26

shivam/-

¶27

U T

Rukhsar Parveen v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rukhsar Parveen v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinbandhoo Kanher @ Abinash Kanher Vs The State of Bihar

Dharamnath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Abujar @ Abuzar Vs The State of Bihar

Kamini Kumari @ Kamini Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Yadav @ Abhisek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Fantus Sahani Vs The State of Bihar