Indrajeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47958 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2025 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Indrajeet Kumar S/o Indal Yadav R/o Village - Baliyaspatti, Ward no. - 09, P.S. - Supaul, Dist. - Supaul.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyam Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 27-07-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

¶11

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 192 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶12

The allegation in the present F.I.R. is that 40 litres of Chulai liquor were recovered from the motorcycle being driven by one Satish Yadav, who was apprehended by the police. Petitioner being the owner of the said motorcycle has been made an accused.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that Satish Yadav, who was known to the petitioner, had taken his motorcycle and, without the knowledge

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47958 of 2026(2) dt.27-07-2026 2/2

¶15

or consent of the petitioner, used the same for illegal activities. He further submits that the petitioner in no way is involved in the alleged crime and he is a man of clean antecedent.

¶16

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶17

Considering the rival submissions of the parties and keeping in view the clean antecedents of the petitioner, as well as the fact that he has been implicated in the present case only on account of being the owner of the motorcycle, let the petitioner named above be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each of the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No.-II, Supaul/concerned court, in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 192 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶18

(Ranjan Kumar Jha, J)

¶19

rishabh/- U T

Indrajeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indrajeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veeru Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Yogendra Mahto @ Yogendra Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Acharmani Devi Vs The State of Bihar