Allowed¶22

Mithilesh Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jul 2026CR. MISC./47954/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.47954 of 2026, decided 21-07-2026 by Ashok Kumar Pandey, J. Bail application under Sections 126(2), 103(1), 109 and 3(5) B.N.S. 2023 in Singhwara P.S. Case No. 101 of 2026 (Darbhanga); petitioner Mithilesh Devi; bail granted with bond of Rs. 10,000/- and two sureties to the satisfaction of CJM, Darbhanga. No precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 101 of 2026. ¶22

Mithilesh Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47954 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2026 Thana- SINGHWARA District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mithilesh Devi W/o Gulab Ray R/o Village - Asthua, PS - Singhwara, District - Darbhanga

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Danish Raja, Advocate. For the Informant : Mr. Om Prakash Kumar, Advocate, For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 21-07-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned

¶14

counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner has prayed for bail registered for the

¶16

offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 103(1), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

¶17

The case of the prosecution, in short, is that one Alok Rai has assaulted with knife to Shiv Shankar Kumar Thakur, due to which he got seriously injured and died during the course of treatment.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that, although the petitioner has been

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47954 of 2026(2) dt.21-07-2026 2/2

¶20

arrayed as an accused in the present case, no specific overt act has been attributed to her. The main thrust of allegation is against co-accused Alok Rai, who is alleged to have given a knife blow to the deceased. He further submits that the petitioner is a lady having no criminal antecedent and she is languishing in judicial custody since 30.03.2026.

¶21

The application for bail is vehemently opposed by the learned counsel for the informant and the learned APP for the State.

¶22

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 101 of 2026.

¶23

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶24

Sudhanshu/-

¶25

U T

Mithilesh Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithilesh Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raushan Kumar @ Sipahi Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Champa Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar