Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an assault case under the BNS where the injury was first reported simple but later opined grievous (fracture of frontal bone). The court noted the prosecution's objection and continuing investigation and refused pre-arrest bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4793 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2025 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran
======================================================
Shivlal Yadav Son of Late Suraj Yadav Resident of Vill. - Miskar Tola, Ward No-14, P.S.- Chanpatiya, Dist.- West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey- A.P.P. Mr.Krishna Kant Pandey Ms.Purnima Kumari ======================================================
... ... Opposite Party/s
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 23-03-2026
APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4793 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026 2/3
relating to land. It is next submitted that initially when the injury report was submitted, the same opined the injury to be simple in nature, though was on vital part of the body, but then, from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that the same records that the injury report was objected by the side of the informant, as such, the Court called for an opinion on the injury received by Rajeshwar Yadav and the opinion which was furnished to the Court by the Pharmacists of the P.H.C. recorded that earlier injury report was issued without consulting the senior doctors but after the senior doctors were consulted, it was found that the injured suffered fracture frontal bone on left side of the head and the same was opined to be grievous in nature which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4793 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026 3/3
A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
stands rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving a grievous head injury allegedly inflicted with a garasa during a land dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivlal Yadav
The State of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
