Haridyanand Ram Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46449 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2026 Thana- BUXAR INDUSTRIAL District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Haridyanand Ram son of Late Lalan Ram Resident of village- Majhariya, PsBuxar (Industrial), Dist- Buxar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 15-07-2026

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 176.76 liters of liquor from two motorcycles.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of one of the seized vehicles. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46449 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026 2/3

¶19

thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that his friend would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged who also fled from the spot.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Buxar Industrial P.S. Case No. 49 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

¶22

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46449 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026 3/3

¶24

anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶25

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶26

Rishabh/-

¶27

U T

Haridyanand Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Haridyanand Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalan Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Chaudhary @ Akhilesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prem Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Chaudhry Vs The State of Bihar

Gopi Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Sharma Vs The State of Bihar