Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Dhaneshar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jul 2026CR. MISC./46078/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail allowed; Arms Act Sections 25(1-b)a and 26; recovery of country-made loaded pistol; Alauli P.S. Case No. 160 of 2026; Khagaria; charge-sheet filed; custody since 21.04.2026; no criminal antecedent; Section 103 BNSS 2023 non-compliance alleged; bail bonds Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of like amount; Patna High Court CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46078 of 2026; Rudra Prakash Mishra, J; decided 15-07-2026; petitioner Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Dhaneshar Yadav; State of Bihar opposed.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Court below, in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 160 of 2026. ¶¶21

Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Dhaneshar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46078 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2026 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Dhaneshar Yadav Son of Late Janak Yadav R/o - Alauli, Ward No.5, P.S - Alauli, District - Khagaria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 15-07-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 160 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

¶15

As per the F.I.R., one country-made loaded pistol has been recovered from this petitioner.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered arms and ammunitions. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46078 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026 2/2

¶18

has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 21.04.2026 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 160 of 2026.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Alok Verma/-

¶24

U T

Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Dhaneshar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Dhaneshar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunal Kumar @ Kunal Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Sardar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajo Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pradip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Bahardar @ Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar