Shiv Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 10-07-2026

¶14

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶16

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 8000 litres of fermented jawa mahua, which was destroyed.

¶17

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even the alleged

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46059 of 2026(2) dt.10-07-2026 2/3

¶19

recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioners and is accessible to villagers at large and they came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar with whom they are on an inimical term. It is next submitted that if Chowkidar was aware about the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence, then why he did not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR, which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution, when petitioners admittedly are persons with clean antecedent.

¶20

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶21

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 204 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶22

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in the event if it is found that petitioners have antecedent of even one

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46059 of 2026(2) dt.10-07-2026 3/3

¶24

case then it would be presumed that petitioners, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed their antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed with respect to that petitioner who had concealed his criminal antecedent before this Court, but after verification if it is found that petitioners are person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶25

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶26

Sumit/-

¶27

U T

Shiv Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pratima Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Chaudhary @ Ranjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajo Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satendra Kumar @ Sikindra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Priyanshu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar