Vikram Kumar @ Wikram Kumar @ Vikrant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4445 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2025 Thana- VISHNUPAD District- Gaya

======================================================

Vikram Kumar @ Wikram Kumar @ Vikrant Kumar Son of Raghvendra Pandey Resident of Mohalla- in front of Jharkhand Bhawan, Purana Vishnupad Road, P.S.- Vishnupad, in the District of Gaya

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ======================================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 17-02-2026

¶11

Heard Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary, learned

¶12

counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Vishnupad P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 15.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 110, 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023.

¶14

According to prosecution case, petitioner and other accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant by hockey, iron rod, lathi , danda , legs and fist. When the informant’s mother came to save him, accused persons, namely, Ranjan and Gopal Kumar beaten her on the chest by leg and fist

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4445 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/3

¶16

due to which she became unconscious and during treatment, she died.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although, the petitioner is named in the FIR but there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act attributed against the petitioner and there is specific allegation of assault is attributed against co-accused persons Rajan and Gopal Kumar that they have assaulted to the deceased.

¶18

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner having clean antecedent and there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act attributed against the petitioner except the petitioner is named in the FIR, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gayaji, in connection with Vishnupad P.S. Case No.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4445 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 3/3

¶21

255 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023, with other following conditions:

¶22

i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶23

ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶25

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶26

Ranjeet/- U T

Vikram Kumar @ Wikram Kumar @ Vikrant Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Kumar @ Wikram Kumar @ Vikrant Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Pandit @ Pawan Kumar Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Kumar Paswan @ Chhotu Kumar @ Chotu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Vinay Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Aman Vs The State of Bihar

Priyadarshi Piyush @ Priyadarshi Piush @ Piyush Priyadarshi Vs The State of Bihar

Samshul Nesha Vs The State of Bihar