Allowed¶20

Anil Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Bail granted – Arms Act case

Patna HC7 Jul 2026CR. MISC./43571/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail; Arms Act sections 25(1-b)a and 26; recovery of country made pistol and live cartridges from below pillow; seizure list witnesses police personnel; Section 105 BNSS seizure compliance argument; judicial custody since 14.03.2026; Morkahi P.S. Case No. 46 of 2026, Khagaria; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; CJM Khagaria; Patna High Court Cr. Misc. No. 43571 of 2026; decided 07-07-2026 by Ashok Kumar Pandey, J.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner to be released in connection with Morkahi P.S. Case No. 46 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Khagaria. ¶20

Anil Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43571 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2026 Thana- MORKAHI District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anil Mahto S/O Late Shukal Mahto Resident of Village- Sada Tola Khuta, P.S.- Morkahi, District- Khagaria

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Patna

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 07-07-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

¶15

The case of the prosecution is that below the pillow of this petitioner, one country made pistol, eight live cartridges and three empty cartridges were recovered.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the basa which is alleged to be belonging to the petitioner is not his basa and that the bed and pillow from where the recovery has been shown, does not belong to him. Nothing has been recovered from the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43571 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026 2/2

¶18

possession of the petitioner. The seizure list witnesses are police personnel and police has not followed Section 105 of BNSS while preparing the seizure. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 14.03.2026.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Morkahi P.S. Case No. 46 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

¶21

each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate(CJM), Khagaria.

¶22

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

Shubham/-

Anil Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahavir Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Indrajeet Kumar @ Karu Rai @ Kuru Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Sabita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Rai Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Renu Kumari Vs The State of Bihar