Regular bail petition by an accused in a Kursela PS case involving assault of informant and family members over a land dispute; allegation against petitioner limited to ordering the attack. Court noted case and counter case, no specific overt act, and custody since October 2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4123 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2025 Thana- KURSAILA District- Katihar
======================================================
Laddu Yadav @ Guddu Yadav S/o- Late Ramdev Yadav R/v- Diyara Chandpur Ps- Kursela Dist- Katihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 Heard Mr. Bhola Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4123 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/4
present case. He further submits that the present case is counter blast of the Kursela P.S. Case No. 47/2025 filed by the mother of the petitioner against the informant and his family members. It appears from the FIR itself that due to admitted land dispute the present occurrence has taken place. There is case and counter case. Although the petitioner is named in the FIR but from a bare perusal of FIR it appears that there is no specific allegation of any assault or overt act attributed against the petitioner. Petitioner is only the order giver and co-accused persons have assaulted the informant and his father and both the persons have received the injuries and the police after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2025.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4123 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/4
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4123 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 4/4
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ranjeet/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, named in the FIR only as an order giver with no specific overt act attributed to him, should be released on bail.
9 provisions across 1 enactments
Laddu Yadav @ Guddu Yadav
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
