Allowed¶19

Sumit Kumar Ray @ Sumit Kumar Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jun 2026CR. MISC./40479/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, CR. MISC. No.40479 of 2026, Ashok Kumar Pandey, J, order dated 25-06-2026: regular bail allowed under Sections 318(4), 61(2) & 3(5) BNS for alleged bluetooth cheating in Civil court Class-IV Examination, 2022 (Garhara P.S. Case No.36/2026, Begusarai); custody since 16.03.2026; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties before JMFC Begusarai; Section 105 BNSS compliance raised regarding police seizure witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Begusarai in connection with Garhara P.S. Case No.36 of 2026. ¶19

Sumit Kumar Ray @ Sumit Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40479 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2026 Thana- Garahara District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sumit Kumar Ray @ Sumit Kumar Rai S/o Surendra Ray Resident of Village - Rewari Ke Mathiya, Ward No.- 10, P.S.- Rewari, District - Saran, Chapra

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Parijat Saurav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 25-06-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Garhara P.S. Case No.36 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 61(2) & 3(5) of the BNS.

¶13

The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner was found cheating through bluetooth in Civil court Class-IV Examination, 2022.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that in this case charge-sheet has been filed and that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 16.03.2026 having no criminal antecedent. It has further been submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40479 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026 2/2

¶16

personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the BNSS.

¶17

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

¶18

for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Begusarai in connection with Garhara P.S. Case No.36 of 2026.

¶20

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

durgesh/-

Sumit Kumar Ray @ Sumit Kumar Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit Kumar Ray @ Sumit Kumar Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Heena Kausar @ Hena Kausar @ Hena Kaisar Vs The State of Bihar

Amarjeet Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Shubham Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar