Santosh Ram Sah @ Santosh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Asha Kumari, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 23-06-2026

¶12

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶13

learned A.P.P. for the State, Ms Asha Kumari.

¶14

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶15

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 0.065 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle.

¶16

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39795 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/3

¶18

create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that his son (Suresh) would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also apprehended from the spot along with Rijaul and Mitaul.

¶19

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶20

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kishanganj Excise P.S. Case No. 757 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶21

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39795 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 3/3

¶23

confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

Sumit/-

¶26

U T

Santosh Ram Sah @ Santosh Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Ram Sah @ Santosh Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Faiz Ahmad @ Syed Faiz Vs The State of Bihar

Pinki Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Yadav @ Vikash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ramchandra Prasad Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanoj Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar