Dabbu Singh @ Dablu @ Aaryan @ Ayan Raj @ Dabba Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38131 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2026 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya

======================================================

Dabbu Singh @ Dablu @ Aaryan @ Ayan Raj @ Dabba Son of late Abhay singh Resident of Village - Suryapura, Police Station - Bodhgaya, DistrictGaya.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KUMAR MANISH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 18-06-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)(a), 26, 35 of Arms Act.

¶15

As per the F.I.R., the prosecution story is based on self statement of informant that on 22.02.2026 at around 8:30 P.M., an information was received that the team of STF had gone to village Khiriyama to collect information about accused Sanjay Manjhi in F.I.R. No.1038 of 2024 of Mofassil P.S. where STF team was attacked by local people resulting injury and also snatched their official pistol. After investigation of police, they found Sanjay Manjhi and Dabbu Singh, i.e., the petitioner

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38131 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026 2/3

¶17

snatched the pistol of a person named, Santosh Choubey and ran away. Further, it has been alleged that the petitioner always carry semi auto pistol with him.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has two criminal antecedents and is in custody since 11.03.2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the seizure list was generated on 23.02.2026 at 04.40 A.M., i.e., almost 5 hours of seizure and that there has been absence of independent witness which is not in compliance of Section 103 and Section 105 of B.N.S.S.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody, i.e., 11.03.2026, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateV, Gaya, in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 59 of 2026, on the following condition :-

¶21

(i) That the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date as fixed by

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38131 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026 3/3

¶23

the Court below.

¶24

(ii) The Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Court below shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail-bond shall not be delayed for purpose of in name of verification.

¶25

(Kumar Manish, J)

¶26

sanjeev/-

¶27

U T

Dabbu Singh @ Dablu @ Aaryan @ Ayan Raj @ Dabba v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dabbu Singh @ Dablu @ Aaryan @ Ayan Raj @ Dabba v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jadu Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Kumar @ Bela @ Baila Vs The State of Bihar

Mritunjay Kumar @ Mirtunjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar