Akhilesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Mar 2026CR. MISC./3753/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Modification petition allowed; extension of surrender period by four weeks; furnishing of bail bonds; order dated 08.08.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 5110 of 2025 modified; PS Case No. 3508 of 2022, Saran complaint case; cost of Rs. 500 to Patna High Court Legal Services Committee; observation on alleged physical torture of wife; petitioner already on bail; Rajiv Roy, J.; decided 18-03-2026.

What did the court decide?

Extension of the period for the petitioner to surrender before the court below for furnishing his bail bonds by a further four weeks from 18-03-2026, subject to payment of Rs. 500/- to the Patna High Court Legal Services Committee. ¶¶26

Akhilesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3753 of 2026

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5110 of 2025

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3508 Year-2022 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaran

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Akhilesh Kumar Singh S/o- Sahdev Singh Residetn of Village- Thikahan Maricha, PS- Garkha District-Saran At Chapra

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar.

¶10

Lalita Devi W/o- Akhilesh Kumar Singh, D/o- Kameshwar Singh Residetn of Village- Bajidpur, PS- Garkha District-Saran At Chapra

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Gharshayam Tiwary, Advocate Mr. Mithelsh Kumar, Advocate ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 18-03-2026

¶15

Heard Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel

¶16

for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, learned APP as also Mr. Mithlesh Kumar representing the opposite party no. 2.

¶17

The present modification has been preferred for:

¶18

“for modification of the order dated 08.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. 5110 of 2025 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy seeking extension of time for surrender of the petitioner before the learned court below for furnishing his bail bonds as the time period of four weeks granted to the petitioner for his surrender in the learned court below granted vide aforesaid order dated 08.08.2025

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3753 of 2026(4) dt.18-03-2026 2/2

¶20

has been expired and till date the petitioner could not surrender before the learned court below for furnishing his bail bonds.”

¶21

In this case, the Cr. Misc. No. 5110 of 2025 was allowed on 08.08.2025 and now, the present modification petition.

¶22

The opposite party no. 2 has appeared and has informed that though the payment is being made, at times, the petitioner tortures the lady physically.

¶23

The lady has all the power in the world to take appropriate steps in accordance with law if the petitioner is continuing with the physical torture.

¶24

This Court will only expect the petitioner-husband not to precipitate the matter further as he is already on bail in the present case.

¶25

With the aforesaid observation, the present modification petition stands allowed subject to the payment of Rs. 500/- to the Patna High Court Legal Services Committee.

¶26

The period of surrender is further extended to four weeks from today.

¶27

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶28

Adnan/-

¶29

Akhilesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhilesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyama Kant Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shabbir Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Jaiprakash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Saraswati Devi Vs The State of Bihar through the Divisional Commissioner

M/s Kushwaha Saw Mill Gheghia-Mohania, Vs That State of Bihar through Mrs. Harjot Kaur Bamhrah, the Principal Secretary

Md. Kaish @ Kais Vs The State of Bihar