Allowed¶7

Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 May 2026CR. MISC./35063/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Release of Suraj Kumar on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court-01, Sitamarhi, in connection with Excise Parihar P.S. Case No. 70 of 2026. ¶7

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35063 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2026 Thana- PARIHAR District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Suraj Kumar, Male, aged about 59 years, Son of Nanhu Mandal, Resident of Village - Barahi, Police Station - Parihar, District - Sitamarhi.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 21-05-2026

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

¶10

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 70 of 2026, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

¶11

As per allegation in the FIR, total 540 liters of country made Nepali liquor has been recovered from a motorcycle.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that on the date of alleged incident, the petitioner was standing near the place of occurrence as a spectator and his name has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that during

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35063 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026 2/3

¶14

investigation not a single witness has come forward to support the prosecution case. He next submits that the seizure list witnesses are not the independent witnesses. He lastly submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the petition and he is in custody since 30.03.2026.

¶15

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

¶16

From perusal of the FIR, seizure list and impugned order of the learned Special Judge Exclusive Excise Court-01, Sitamarhi dated 17.04.2026, it appears that petitioner is named in the FIR. From perusal of the records, it appears that on the basis of written report of the informant, FIR has been registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 against the present petitioner. It also appears that petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the petition and is in custody since 30.03.2026 and there is no any independent witness of the seizure list, so considering all the aspects of the case and submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the above named petitioner.

¶17

Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the above named petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35063 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026 3/3

¶19

named be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court-01, Sitamarhi in connection with Excise Parihar P.S. Case No. 70 of 2026.

¶20

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶21

Anand Kr.

¶22

U T

Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kanchan Kumar @ Kanchan Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rambabu Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Ambuj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar