Allowed¶21

Hasmuddin @ Kaliya @ Md. Hasmuddin @ Md. Hasmudin v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jun 2026CR. MISC./34425/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; Section 303(2) BNS; Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 1228 of 2025; East Champaran; stolen motorcycle recovery; CCTV footage identification; charge-sheet submitted; custody since 10.12.2025; bail bonds Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount; Chief Judicial Magistrate Motihari; Ansul J.; Patna High Court Criminal Miscellaneous No.34425 of 2026; prima facie observations limited to bail adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 1228 of 2025. ¶21

Hasmuddin @ Kaliya @ Md. Hasmuddin @ Md. Hasmudin Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶21

Issue for consideration

Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 1228 of 2025, registered for offences under Section 303(2) BNS.

¶13

Court's answer

Considering that the charge-sheet has already been submitted (so the petitioner is no longer required for investigation) and that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.12.2025, the Court is inclined to grant bail.

¶20

Ratio / Principle

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 1228 of 2025.

¶21

Key takeaways

Any observation made in the order is prima facie in nature, limited solely to adjudication of the present bail application, shall not be construed as an expression on the merits, and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings.obiter¶22

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail granted — Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.34425 of 2026 (Ansul, J.), order dated 24-06-2026: Petitioner, arraigned in Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 1228 of 2025 under Section 303(2) BNS on allegations that a stolen motorcycle was recovered from his possession and that he was identified in CCTV footage committing theft, sought bail. Noting that the charge-sheet had already been submitted (petitioner no longer required for investigation) and that he had been in custody since 10.12.2025, the Court granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran. All observations were declared prima facie, confined to the bail adjudication, and not to bear on the merits or the trial.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34425 of 2026

¶2

Arising out of PS. Case No.-1228 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East

¶3

Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Hasmuddin @ Kaliya @ Md. Hasmuddin @ Md. Hasmudin S/o Nasaruddin @ Nasuriddin @ Md. Nasuriddin R/o Village - Shikarganj Ward no. 7, P.S. - Shikarganj, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in Motihari Town P.S.

¶14

Case No. 1228 of 2025 registered for the offences under Section 303(2) BNS.

¶15

The allegation is that stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He was identified in the CCTV footage committing theft.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted in the case as such petitioner is no more required for investigation and the petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2025.

¶17

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34425 of 2026(3) dt.24-06-2026 2/2

¶19

has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering that the charge-sheet has already been submitted in the case as such petitioner is no more required for investigation and the petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2025, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 1228 of 2025.

¶22

It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

¶23

(Ansul, J)

¶24

Vikash/-

Hasmuddin @ Kaliya @ Md. Hasmuddin @ Md. Hasmudin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hasmuddin @ Kaliya @ Md. Hasmuddin @ Md. Hasmudin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rekha Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Amar Nath @ Rana Shankar Vakil @ Ram Shankar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sandeep Kumar Gupta @ Sandeep Prasad @ Sandeep Prasad Sao Vs the State of Bihar

Kishore Pal Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Praveen Kumar @ Pravin Kumar Vs The State of Bihar