the petitioner has further drawn the attention of this Court to the injury report of Ravindra Yadav, which shows that he has sustained two injuries, one of which is pain and swelling over parietal region of the scalp and that injury has been opined to be grievous in nature caused by hard and blunt substance, while, the injury report of Renu Devi goes to show that she has received two injuries one of which is grievous in nature too caused by hard and blunt substance and is primarily a bleeding injury in form of a Nasal Bleed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has thus submitted that neither Ravindra Yadav nor Renu Devi sustained any sharp-cutting injury, despite the specific allegation of assault by means of a farsa and a sword, it has further been submitted that there are two accused persons including this petitioner to have assaulted on head and nose of injured Ravindra Yadav and Renu Devi, respectively, but there is only one injury on the head and nose, which are opined to be grievous in nature. It has further been submitted that when there is an allegation of assault by sword and farsa, and specifying it to be a sharp cutting weapon in the FIR itself indicate that the injuries being opined to be caused by hard and blunt substance, falsifies the entire case. It has lastly been submitted that petitioner was made accused in one another case in which he is
