Allowed

Aditi Mallick @ Aditi Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 May 2026CR. MISC./32976/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought modification of bail conditions, pleading hardship from mandatory personal court attendance on each trial date as she alone cares for her minor children while her husband is in custody. The court deleted condition (i) and retained the remaining three bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Condition no. (i) of the bail order dated 02.07.2025 deleted; remaining conditions (ii) to (iv) retained.

Aditi Mallick @ Aditi Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32976 of 2026

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6700 of 2025

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2022 Thana- KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- Katihar

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Aditi Mallick @ Aditi Kumari Wife of Narayan Kumar Mallick @ Narayan Mallick Resident of village- Lohiya Nagar, Ps -Sahayak , Dist- Katihar

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhigyan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 08-05-2026

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

¶12

The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 02.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6700 of 2025, whereby the provisional bail granted to the petitioner was confirmed, subject to certain conditions.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a lady, having two minor children, who are presently pursuing their studies at Ryan International School, Goregaon (East), Mumbai and the husband of the petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.11.2024. It is further submitted that the petitioner is solely responsible for the care, upbringing and education of her minor children and according to condition no.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32976 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/2

¶15

(i) the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each date of the trial, is causing extreme hardship and practically impossible for her to take care of her minor children and also pursuing in their education. Hence, the condition no. (i) out of four conditions, as referred in the order dated 02.07.2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6700 of 2025, may be exempted.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let condition no. (i) be deleted, out of four conditions, from the order dated 02.07.2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6700 of 2025 and other three conditions which are condition nos. (ii) to (iv) shall remain intact.

¶17

Accordingly, the prayer for modification is allowed and the petition stands disposed of.

¶18

(Sourendra Pandey, J)

¶19

krishna/-

¶20

U T

Aditi Mallick @ Aditi Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aditi Mallick @ Aditi Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sohag Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Satya Bhama Devi @ Satyabhama Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Veer Pratap Singh @ Banti Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vimal Prasad Singh, Vs The State of Bihar

Mansi Matsyajibi Sahyog Ltd. Vs The Union of Indian