Shivam Kumar @ Shubhankar Yadav @ Shiv Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a)(c)(d) and 32(3) of the Excise Act.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized motorcycle and he came to be implicated at the instance of local person, but the name of the person, who disclosed the name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the F.I.R.,

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32186 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/3

¶18

which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution, when admittedly petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

¶20

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Gogari Excise P. S. Case No.51 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

7. The application stands allowed.

¶22

It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, then it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed his antecedent before this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32186 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 3/3

¶24

not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶25

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶26

vikash/-

¶27

U T

Shivam Kumar @ Shubhankar Yadav @ Shiv Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivam Kumar @ Shubhankar Yadav @ Shiv Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Paro Mandal @ Arun Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Gupta @ Jitendra Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar @ Roshan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar