Dismissed¶21

Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 May 2026CR. MISC./32162/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail rejected; second bail application; Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 70 of 2024; Sections 376, 34 IPC; earlier rejection dated 15.10.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 51041 of 2025; Section 164 Cr.P.C. victim statement; custody since 11.05.2025; cognizance 04.07.2025; charges framed 16.12.2025; no witness examined; direction to conclude trial within six months; liberty to renew.

What did the court decide?

There is no fresh ground to consider the petitioner's bail petition. ¶20

Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32162 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2024 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East

¶3

Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar S/o Late Shyam Sundar Sah Resident of Village- Purnahiya, P.S.- Ghyorasahan, District- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewanand Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 08-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

¶13

for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 70 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 376, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Earlier, vide order dated 15.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51041 of 2025, regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 11.05.2025 without any rhymes or reason. He further submits that cognizance has been taken on 04.07.2025 and charges have been

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32162 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/2

¶18

framed on 16.12.2025 but no any witness has been examined by the learned Trial Court in this case.

¶19

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

¶20

There is no fresh ground to consider the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

In view of the above, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from today. If the trial is not concluded within the period of six months, as stated above, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer before the court below.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Alok Verma/-

¶24

U T

Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Minhaz Alam Vs Raj Kumar Chaudhary

Shreemati Dharamshila Devi Vs None

Anil Kumar Vs Estate of Most. Kaushalya Devi

Bambam Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Kumar Kushwaha Vs The State of Bihar

Parmendra Kumar @ Parmendra Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar