Monu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30891 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2026 Thana- BEN P.S. District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Monu Kumar Son of Munirak Manjhi @ Mundrika Manjhi Resident of Village-Dharahara, P.S - Ben, District - Nalanda

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 07-05-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶11

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 6 litres of liquor from a place behind the house of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner but then is adjacent to his house and he came to be implicated at the instance of the Chawkidar with whom he is on an inimical

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30891 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/3

¶16

term. It is next submitted that if the Chawkidar was aware of the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence then why he did not inform the police prior to the institution of the instant FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ben P.S. Case No. 43 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

¶19

However, it is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30891 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 3/3

¶21

shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶22

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶23

Kundan/-

¶24

U T

Monu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Monu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fuljhari Devi @ Sarswati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Manish Choudhari Vs The State of Bihar

Bharat Pasi Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Dileep Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Anup Kumar Vs The State of Bihar