Ram Somari Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 07.04.2026, in connection with Bhutahi P.S. Case No. 36 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 20.02.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

¶16

Recovery is of 220.5 litres of Nepali Soufi liquor.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather recovery has been made near the Registry Office and petitioner has been made accused in the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30806 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/3

¶19

present case merely on the basis of suspicion and except the suspicion, nothing has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. Apart from the aforesaid, the seizure list witnesses are police personnel so there is non-compliance of Sections 103 and 105 of BNSS, 2023 and the petitioner is in custody since 07.04.2026.

¶20

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries two more cases other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matters.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and there is non-compliance of Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, 2023, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-I, Sitamarhi in connection with Bhutahi P.S. Case No. 36 of 2026, subject to the following conditions :-

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30806 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 3/3

¶23

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶24

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶25

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed her criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶26

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶27

Ibrar//-

¶28

U T

Ram Somari Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Somari Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar, Through Sri Vinodanand Jha The Director, Jan Shiksha Mass Education , New Sec

Chanchala Devi @ Guddi Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Arjun Baitha Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lalan Kumar @ Lalan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ramayan sahani Vs The State of Bihar