from which the alleged recovery was made. It has also been submitted that the petitioner was unaware of the alleged contraband being kept in the tempo. It has further been submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It has further been submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and procedure prescribed under Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. has not been followed. It has further been submitted that the alleged recovery is intermediary quantity and is much less than the commercial quantity. It has further been submitted that co-accused namely, Sonu Kumar, who is driver and owner of the said tempo, has already been granted the privilege of the bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.07.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35626 of 2026. Moreover, co-accused Dinesh Kumar has also been granted the privilege of bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.05.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33026 of 2026. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 28.01.2026.