Sandeep Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-05-2026

¶13

Heard Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel

¶14

appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Mahmadpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS.

¶16

As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioner along with other co-accused persons, had assaulted the informant and his family members, causing head injury to the informant. Specific allegation against the petitioner is that he had assaulted on the head of the informant by means of Farsa .

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30246 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/3

¶19

been implicated in the present case. Specific allegation against the petitioner is that he had assaulted on the head of the informant by means of Farsa causing head injury, however, the same has been opined by the doctor to be simple in nature and in this regard, he has made a specific statement in paragraph no. 9 of the bail application. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.

¶20

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

¶21

Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, the fact that specific allegation in the FIR against the petitioner that he is the one, who had assaulted on the head of the informant causing injury, which was finally opined by the doctor to be simple in nature, learned District Court is directed to call for the final injury report and if the injury attributable to the petitioner is not found fatal to the life of the informant, then in that case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30246 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 3/3

¶23

Court where the case is pending, in connection with Mahmadpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2026, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶24

The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioner as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.

¶25

Accordingly, the present bail application stands

¶26

disposed of.

¶27

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶28

Niraj/-

¶29

U T

Sandeep Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Prince Dubey @ Suman Saurav Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Jaisri Nandan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar